Scott Hejny

Partner

Scott Hejny is a trial lawyer and registered patent attorney who represents plaintiffs and defendants in high-stakes intellectual property litigation and complex commercial disputes throughout the United States. With more than 20 years of experience, Scott has served as trial counsel in patent cases involving wireless communications, data transmission, oilfield tools and processes, integrated circuits, software, environmental control systems and pharmaceutical technologies.

Scott draws on his engineering and patent prosecution experience to understand complex technologies and present them clearly to judges and juries. Before earning his law degree, he worked as a patent agent drafting and prosecuting electrical and mechanical patent applications and as a design engineer for a major oilfield services company.

Locations

Dallas

2200 Ross Ave, Dallas, TX 75201

Representative Experience

Plaintiff Verdict on Behalf of Computer Software Company
Successfully represented plaintiff OSHGD LLC in a lawsuit against Nomi Health, Inc. in a computer software dispute in state court in Dallas, Texas for a claim for breach of a software license agreement used in Covid-19 testing. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $4 million, which also led to the confidential settlement of a larger copyright infringement lawsuit filed by OSGHC against Nomi Health in Dallas federal court.

PTAB and PTO Victories for Telecom Clients and Patent Owners
Served as lead counsel for major telecommunications companies, including AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Ericsson, and Nokia, as well as other patent owners, in over 200 inter partes review and ex parte reexamination proceedings pending before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, leading to recognition as one of the top 1% of practitioners in the United States.

Halliburton Geophysical Software Patent Litigation
Successfully represented Halliburton in Dynamic 3D Geosolutions LLC v. Halliburton et al., a patent infringement action involving geophysical software used to produce three-dimensional models of subterranean formations. 

LMKR Geophysical Software Patent Litigation 
Successfully represented LMKR in Dynamic 3D Geosolutions LLC v. LMKR et al., a patent infringement action involving geophysical software used to create three-dimensional models of subterranean formations. 

Downhole Separator Patent and Trade Secret Litigation 
Successfully represented Halliburton in Legacy Separators LLC v. Halliburton et al., a patent infringement and trade secret dispute involving downhole separators used to remove gas from production fluids in subterranean wells. 

Complete Defense Verdict in Agricultural Equipment Patent Trial 
Served as lead trial counsel for Alamo Group and Bush Hog in Deere & Co. v. Alamo Group and Bush Hog Inc., a patent infringement action involving flex-wing rotary cutters. Following a three-week trial in Davenport, Iowa, the jury found that the asserted patent was not infringed and was invalid on multiple grounds. 

Deepwater Horizon Multidistrict Litigation
Represented Halliburton and Sperry Sun in multidistrict litigation arising from the Macondo well blowout and Deepwater Horizon oil spill and led the team that established the root cause for the failure of the well, the reasoning adopted by the court in its final findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Favorable Resolution of Downhole Tool Patent Litigation 
Successfully represented Halliburton in Weatherford International v. Halliburton, a patent infringement action involving methods for forming composite components used in downhole tools, including frac plugs, bridge plugs and packers. The matter settled on favorable terms. 

Plaintiff’s Verdict in Web Server Patent Trial 
Represented Bedrock as trial counsel in Bedrock v. Google, a patent infringement action involving software designed to improve the speed and efficiency of web servers. Following a six-day trial in Tyler, Texas, the jury found the patent infringed and valid and awarded a royalty to Bedrock. The matter settled before entry of judgment. 

Seven-Patent Enterprise Software Litigation 
Successfully represented i2 Technologies as plaintiff in i2 Technologies v. SAP, asserting infringement of seven patents involving enterprise software. The matter settled shortly after the claim construction hearing. 

Favorable Resolution of Drill-Bit Patent Litigation 
Represented US Synthetic Corporation and Halliburton Energy Services against claims alleging infringement of four patents involving leached diamond drill-bit cutting elements. The matter settled on favorable terms shortly after the pretrial conference. 

Credentials

Admissions 

  • Texas 
  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas 
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas 
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas 
  • U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas 
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 

Education 

  • University of Houston Law Center (J.D., cum laude, 2002) 
    • Order of the Barons 
    • Houston Law Review, Articles Editor 
  • Rice University (M.S., Mechanical Engineering, 1997) 
  • Texas A&M University (B.S., magna cum laude, Aerospace Engineering, 1995) 
News & Insights

Bylines 

  • “IPR Pointers in Recent PTAB Discretionary Denials,” co-author with Kevin Schubert, Law360, August 16, 2023 
  • “Recent Federal Circuit Patent Eligibility Rulings Offer Drafting Tips,” co-author with Kevin Schubert, Law360, November 7, 2022 
  • “Arthrex: More Unanswered Questions,” World IP Review, November 17, 2021 
  • “Arthrex: The Supreme Court Preserves the PTAB System,” co-author with Kat Li and James Quigley, Licensing Executives Society, June 28, 2021 
  • “A Question of Authority – The Federal Circuit’s Criticism of the POP in Windy City,” co-author with James Quigley, Texas Lawyer, April 21, 2020 
  • “The Downsides of PTAB’s New Claim Amendment Program,” Law360, April 8, 2019 
  • “SAS Indirectly Strengthens the Impact of Estoppel,” co-author with Chelsea Priest, Law360, May 8, 2018 

Presentations 

  • “The Year in Review: Changes at the PTAB,” speaker, Avanci Academy, June 2026
  • “5 Ways to Win a Case,” moderator, 2023 IP Dealmakers Forum, December 1, 2023 
  • “The Intersection of IP and AI Research at Universities,” roundtable participant, AUTM 2023, February 16, 2023 
  • 52nd Annual Conference on Intellectual Property Law, speaker, Center for American and International Law, November 10, 2014 
Honors & Awards
  • The Best Lawyers in America, Litigation – Intellectual Property; Litigation – Patent; Patent Law, 2024 – 2027 
  • Patexia PTAB Intelligence Report, Top 25 Most Active Attorneys Representing Patent Owners and Top Performing Attorneys Representing Patent Owners, 2024 – 2025 
  • Texas Super Lawyers, Rising Stars, 2008 – 2012 
Memberships
  • American Bar Association 
  • Federal Circuit Bar Association
  • Texas A&M Bar Association
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association 
  • Dallas Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section, Past Director 
Civic Leadership 
  • City Commissioner for Ward 3, City of Ennis, Texas
  • Board Member, Ennis Economic Development Corporation